<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1653 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278117</link>
    <description>The reassessment challenge turned on whether the assessee had been supplied the recorded reasons for reopening and given an opportunity to have objections decided before reassessment. Because the appellate record contained no finding on this factual aspect, the issue could not be conclusively determined without examining the assessment record. The challenge to the reopening was therefore remitted to the CIT(A) for decision in accordance with law, and the connected merits were also sent back for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 06:10:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1653 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278117</link>
      <description>The reassessment challenge turned on whether the assessee had been supplied the recorded reasons for reopening and given an opportunity to have objections decided before reassessment. Because the appellate record contained no finding on this factual aspect, the issue could not be conclusively determined without examining the assessment record. The challenge to the reopening was therefore remitted to the CIT(A) for decision in accordance with law, and the connected merits were also sent back for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>