<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (1) TMI 1422 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278119</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) based on estimations without conclusive evidence of concealment or inaccurate particulars, following the legal principles established in the case of CIT vs. Mahendra Singh Khedla.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 06:10:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (1) TMI 1422 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278119</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) based on estimations without conclusive evidence of concealment or inaccurate particulars, following the legal principles established in the case of CIT vs. Mahendra Singh Khedla.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>