<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (7) TMI 60 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16239</link>
    <description>Subsidy classification depends on its purpose: if the grant is intended to enable an assessee to set up or complete a project, it is capital in nature, while a subsidy meant to support business operations after commencement of production is revenue in nature. The record lacked a clear finding on whether the Government subsidy was given for establishing a new unit or for assisting ongoing operations, so the factual basis needed to answer the reference was absent. The question was therefore returned unanswered and the matter was remitted to the Appellate Tribunal for a specific finding on the subsidy&#039;s purpose and fresh disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:35:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (7) TMI 60 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16239</link>
      <description>Subsidy classification depends on its purpose: if the grant is intended to enable an assessee to set up or complete a project, it is capital in nature, while a subsidy meant to support business operations after commencement of production is revenue in nature. The record lacked a clear finding on whether the Government subsidy was given for establishing a new unit or for assisting ongoing operations, so the factual basis needed to answer the reference was absent. The question was therefore returned unanswered and the matter was remitted to the Appellate Tribunal for a specific finding on the subsidy&#039;s purpose and fresh disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>