<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 479 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373314</link>
    <description>The High Court determined that the properties rented out by the assessee qualified as commercial establishments, meeting the exemption criteria under Section 2(ea) of the Wealth Tax Act. The Court held that the term &quot;commercial establishments&quot; in the exception clause encompasses single units, rejecting the revenue&#039;s argument requiring multiple units for exclusion. Consequently, the Court dismissed the tax appeals, finding no legal issue to address.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 11:08:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 479 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373314</link>
      <description>The High Court determined that the properties rented out by the assessee qualified as commercial establishments, meeting the exemption criteria under Section 2(ea) of the Wealth Tax Act. The Court held that the term &quot;commercial establishments&quot; in the exception clause encompasses single units, rejecting the revenue&#039;s argument requiring multiple units for exclusion. Consequently, the Court dismissed the tax appeals, finding no legal issue to address.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>