https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16219 The court upheld the order of the learned single judge, finding it well-reasoned and protective of the parties' interests. The court declined to interfere, stating that the appellants' liability to pay fees and charges to the special auditor would be determined at the final hearing. The appeal and stay application were disposed of without costs, with a clarification that the decision did not indicate a stance on the case's merits. The court emphasized that the appellants' ultimate liability would hinge on the writ application's outcome, ensuring they would not be prejudiced by payments to the auditor. en-us Wed, 29 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:21:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16219 The court upheld the order of the learned single judge, finding it well-reasoned and protective of the parties' interests. The court declined to interfere, stating that the appellants' liability to pay fees and charges to the special auditor would be determined at the final hearing. The appeal and stay application were disposed of without costs, with a clarification that the decision did not indicate a stance on the case's merits. The court emphasized that the appellants' ultimate liability would hinge on the writ application's outcome, ensuring they would not be prejudiced by payments to the auditor. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 29 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16219