<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 466 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373301</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the necessity of factual evidence and consistency in penalty determinations under the Income Tax Act. It held that penalties relying solely on estimations, without concrete proof of concealment or inaccuracies, are unwarranted. The decision highlighted the importance of factual findings and annulled the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 10:34:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 466 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373301</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the necessity of factual evidence and consistency in penalty determinations under the Income Tax Act. It held that penalties relying solely on estimations, without concrete proof of concealment or inaccuracies, are unwarranted. The decision highlighted the importance of factual findings and annulled the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>