<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 459 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373294</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of penalties under Sections 271D and 271E for the assessment year 2010-2011. It concluded that the evidence was insufficient to prove violations of Sections 269SS and 269T, determining that the transactions were business advances outside the purview of these sections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 10:24:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 459 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373294</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of penalties under Sections 271D and 271E for the assessment year 2010-2011. It concluded that the evidence was insufficient to prove violations of Sections 269SS and 269T, determining that the transactions were business advances outside the purview of these sections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>