<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 449 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373284</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confiscating imported goods and imposing penalties under the Customs Act due to discrepancies in valuation. The appellant&#039;s argument of forced acceptance of enhanced values due to clearance delays was considered. The Tribunal emphasized the need to rely on contemporaneous imports for valuation, finding the Revenue&#039;s reliance on internet prices insufficient. The appeal was allowed with consequential benefits granted to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 08:02:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 449 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373284</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order confiscating imported goods and imposing penalties under the Customs Act due to discrepancies in valuation. The appellant&#039;s argument of forced acceptance of enhanced values due to clearance delays was considered. The Tribunal emphasized the need to rely on contemporaneous imports for valuation, finding the Revenue&#039;s reliance on internet prices insufficient. The appeal was allowed with consequential benefits granted to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>