<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 448 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373283</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for a fresh adjudication, emphasizing that Maximum Retail Price (MRP) becomes relevant only after sterilization and repacking. The Tribunal disagreed with the lower authority&#039;s rejection of the refund claim and ordered a re-adjudication by the adjudicating authority, leaving all contentions open for consideration without being influenced by previous findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 08:02:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 448 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373283</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case for a fresh adjudication, emphasizing that Maximum Retail Price (MRP) becomes relevant only after sterilization and repacking. The Tribunal disagreed with the lower authority&#039;s rejection of the refund claim and ordered a re-adjudication by the adjudicating authority, leaving all contentions open for consideration without being influenced by previous findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>