<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 440 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373275</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the demand for service tax on ocean freight collected by the appellants could not be sustained. Referring to precedent cases, the Tribunal concluded that notional surplus charged for ocean freight is not subject to service tax. Therefore, the impugned order confirming the service tax demand, interest, and penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 07:44:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 440 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373275</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the demand for service tax on ocean freight collected by the appellants could not be sustained. Referring to precedent cases, the Tribunal concluded that notional surplus charged for ocean freight is not subject to service tax. Therefore, the impugned order confirming the service tax demand, interest, and penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>