https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373266 The Supreme Court upheld the Commissioner's finding that certain products, including Dena Ji Brand Satritha shampoo, were correctly classified as shampoo for excise duty purposes, not as ayurvedic medicines as argued by the petitioner. The court emphasized the importance of factual determinations in classification cases and affirmed the duty payment requirement based on the product being classified as shampoo. The petition was disposed of in line with these findings, highlighting the significance of accurate product classification for excise duty obligations. en-us Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Apr 2019 12:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373266 The Supreme Court upheld the Commissioner's finding that certain products, including Dena Ji Brand Satritha shampoo, were correctly classified as shampoo for excise duty purposes, not as ayurvedic medicines as argued by the petitioner. The court emphasized the importance of factual determinations in classification cases and affirmed the duty payment requirement based on the product being classified as shampoo. The petition was disposed of in line with these findings, highlighting the significance of accurate product classification for excise duty obligations. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373266