<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 428 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373263</link>
    <description>On finalisation of provisional assessment, excess excise duty paid on some clearances may be adjusted against short payment for the same period, so the duty liability must be netted across the entire assessment period and only any remaining shortfall can be recovered. The note states that later authorities departed from the earlier Excel Rubber Ltd. view and followed the principle in Toyota Kirloskar Auto Parts Pvt. Ltd., under which the Revenue cannot demand differential duty without first accounting for duty already paid during the relevant period. The settled line of authority was applied to reject the contrary approach.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 19:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=552116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 428 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373263</link>
      <description>On finalisation of provisional assessment, excess excise duty paid on some clearances may be adjusted against short payment for the same period, so the duty liability must be netted across the entire assessment period and only any remaining shortfall can be recovered. The note states that later authorities departed from the earlier Excel Rubber Ltd. view and followed the principle in Toyota Kirloskar Auto Parts Pvt. Ltd., under which the Revenue cannot demand differential duty without first accounting for duty already paid during the relevant period. The settled line of authority was applied to reject the contrary approach.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>