https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373262 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that the services provided by a third party were for hiring specialized packing equipment, not directly related to manufacturing as per the definition of input services under the CCR 2004. The denial of cenvat credit and penalties imposed by the lower authorities were set aside, allowing the appeal and any consequential benefits to the appellants. en-us Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Jan 2019 06:33:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373262 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding that the services provided by a third party were for hiring specialized packing equipment, not directly related to manufacturing as per the definition of input services under the CCR 2004. The denial of cenvat credit and penalties imposed by the lower authorities were set aside, allowing the appeal and any consequential benefits to the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373262