https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278103 Authority limited to negotiating the sale of immovable property does not include power to execute an agreement for sale or otherwise bind the owner. Negotiation was confined to discussion, bargaining, and arranging proposed terms, while completion of the bargain required express authority to dispose of the property. On that construction, the attorney lacked authority to enter into a sale agreement, and such agreement could not found a claim for specific performance against the owner. The stated ratio is that a mere negotiation clause is insufficient to create contractual authority to transfer property. en-us Tue, 23 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Jul 2025 15:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278103 Authority limited to negotiating the sale of immovable property does not include power to execute an agreement for sale or otherwise bind the owner. Negotiation was confined to discussion, bargaining, and arranging proposed terms, while completion of the bargain required express authority to dispose of the property. On that construction, the attorney lacked authority to enter into a sale agreement, and such agreement could not found a claim for specific performance against the owner. The stated ratio is that a mere negotiation clause is insufficient to create contractual authority to transfer property. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 Jul 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278103