<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 73 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16198</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether interest on borrowings used to acquire shares, purchased with the primary intention of obtaining controlling interest, was deductible under s.57(iii) as expenditure incurred &quot;wholly and exclusively&quot; for earning income under the head &quot;Income from other sources&quot;. The HC held that s.57(iii) requires the dominant and immediate purpose of the expenditure to be the earning of such income (e.g., dividends); where the expenditure is incurred to acquire or protect control, it falls outside s.57(iii), consistent with prior HC and other HC authority distinguishing control-related outlays from income-earning expenditure. Consequently, the interest was not allowable as a deduction, and the reference was answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2025 16:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55198" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 73 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16198</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether interest on borrowings used to acquire shares, purchased with the primary intention of obtaining controlling interest, was deductible under s.57(iii) as expenditure incurred &quot;wholly and exclusively&quot; for earning income under the head &quot;Income from other sources&quot;. The HC held that s.57(iii) requires the dominant and immediate purpose of the expenditure to be the earning of such income (e.g., dividends); where the expenditure is incurred to acquire or protect control, it falls outside s.57(iii), consistent with prior HC and other HC authority distinguishing control-related outlays from income-earning expenditure. Consequently, the interest was not allowable as a deduction, and the reference was answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>