<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 404 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373239</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the AO to delete the additions made to the assessee&#039;s income. The donations were not treated as anonymous under Section 115BBC as the assessee maintained records of donor details. Additionally, the ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the addition of depreciation to income, stating that depreciation was not claimed as an application of income. Therefore, both additions were deleted, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 08:24:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 404 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373239</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the AO to delete the additions made to the assessee&#039;s income. The donations were not treated as anonymous under Section 115BBC as the assessee maintained records of donor details. Additionally, the ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the addition of depreciation to income, stating that depreciation was not claimed as an application of income. Therefore, both additions were deleted, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>