<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 392 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373227</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the disallowance of the interest claim under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The appellant failed to prove that the investments were made from surplus funds and the subsequent treatment of profits as capital gains weakened the claim for business expenditure. The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s non-interest bearing funds exceeded non-business investments, supporting the disallowance of the interest claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 08:23:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 392 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373227</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the disallowance of the interest claim under section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The appellant failed to prove that the investments were made from surplus funds and the subsequent treatment of profits as capital gains weakened the claim for business expenditure. The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s non-interest bearing funds exceeded non-business investments, supporting the disallowance of the interest claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>