<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 390 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373225</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to levy late filing fees under section 234E for periods before the amendment effective from 01.06.2015. Consequently, the late filing fees for the assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15 were quashed, leading to the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeals. The Stay Applications filed by the assessee were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 08:23:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 390 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373225</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to levy late filing fees under section 234E for periods before the amendment effective from 01.06.2015. Consequently, the late filing fees for the assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15 were quashed, leading to the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeals. The Stay Applications filed by the assessee were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>