<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 378 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373213</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a chain of hospitals, in a tax liability case regarding health services provided to doctors. The Revenue claimed the hospitals provided infrastructural support services subjecting them to tax, but the Tribunal found joint benefits with shared obligations, ruling out specific infrastructural support. The Tribunal emphasized the mutual arrangement for health care services, not business support services, under the negative list regime exempting health care services from service tax. The appeal was allowed, highlighting the absence of taxable activity and legal exemption for health care services by clinical establishments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 06:44:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 378 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373213</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a chain of hospitals, in a tax liability case regarding health services provided to doctors. The Revenue claimed the hospitals provided infrastructural support services subjecting them to tax, but the Tribunal found joint benefits with shared obligations, ruling out specific infrastructural support. The Tribunal emphasized the mutual arrangement for health care services, not business support services, under the negative list regime exempting health care services from service tax. The appeal was allowed, highlighting the absence of taxable activity and legal exemption for health care services by clinical establishments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>