<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 369 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373204</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders adjusting the refund amount towards arrears, directing immediate refund if not already done. Interest on the delayed refund would accrue three months after the final appeal disposal on 14.07.2016, if the pre-deposit amount remained unreimbursed. The decision aligned with legal precedents and circulars mandating timely refund post-order in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 06:43:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 369 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373204</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders adjusting the refund amount towards arrears, directing immediate refund if not already done. Interest on the delayed refund would accrue three months after the final appeal disposal on 14.07.2016, if the pre-deposit amount remained unreimbursed. The decision aligned with legal precedents and circulars mandating timely refund post-order in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>