https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373198 The High Court allowed the writ petitions challenging assessment orders for the years 2009-10 to 2013-14, focusing on ITC reversal issues. The Court found that the Assessing Officer failed to provide sufficient reasoning on the disputed issues and did not consider the petitioner's objections adequately. The Court agreed with the petitioner that they should not be penalized for discrepancies in reporting by other dealers when they had valid purchase invoices. Consequently, the assessment orders on the disputed issues were set aside, and the matter was remitted for reassessment with a directive to provide the petitioner with a fresh opportunity for a hearing within six weeks. en-us Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Jan 2019 06:43:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373198 The High Court allowed the writ petitions challenging assessment orders for the years 2009-10 to 2013-14, focusing on ITC reversal issues. The Court found that the Assessing Officer failed to provide sufficient reasoning on the disputed issues and did not consider the petitioner's objections adequately. The Court agreed with the petitioner that they should not be penalized for discrepancies in reporting by other dealers when they had valid purchase invoices. Consequently, the assessment orders on the disputed issues were set aside, and the matter was remitted for reassessment with a directive to provide the petitioner with a fresh opportunity for a hearing within six weeks. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373198