<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 357 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373192</link>
    <description>Challenge to the retrospective operation of rule 96(10)(b) of the CGST Rules, 2017 became infructuous after subsequent notifications of 9 October 2018 substituted sub-rule (10) and made the provision prospective. As the only grievance related to the withdrawn retrospective effect, the High Court found no live controversy remained for adjudication. The petition was therefore disposed of as infructuous, with notice discharged and no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2025 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 357 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373192</link>
      <description>Challenge to the retrospective operation of rule 96(10)(b) of the CGST Rules, 2017 became infructuous after subsequent notifications of 9 October 2018 substituted sub-rule (10) and made the provision prospective. As the only grievance related to the withdrawn retrospective effect, the High Court found no live controversy remained for adjudication. The petition was therefore disposed of as infructuous, with notice discharged and no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>