<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 354 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373189</link>
    <description>The court quashed the order transferring assessment jurisdiction from Kolkata to Aurangabad under Section 127 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as it lacked justification and reasons. The court emphasized the right of the assessee to know the reasons for such transfers. The decision allowed the department to proceed with previous proceedings or initiate new ones, but directed them to provide reasoned orders in compliance with natural justice principles in the future. The writ petition was disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 10:49:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 354 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373189</link>
      <description>The court quashed the order transferring assessment jurisdiction from Kolkata to Aurangabad under Section 127 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as it lacked justification and reasons. The court emphasized the right of the assessee to know the reasons for such transfers. The decision allowed the department to proceed with previous proceedings or initiate new ones, but directed them to provide reasoned orders in compliance with natural justice principles in the future. The writ petition was disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>