<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 353 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373188</link>
    <description>A reassessment notice under section 148 issued in the name of a deceased assessee was held to be a jurisdictional nullity. Since the legal representative promptly objected to validity and did not comply with or submit to the AO&#039;s jurisdiction, there was no waiver of the statutory requirement of a valid section 148 notice. Section 292B could not cure issuance of a jurisdictional notice to a dead person in these circumstances. Consequently, in the absence of a valid notice, the AO lacked authority to assume jurisdiction under section 147, and all consequential reassessment proceedings were without authority of law and unsustainable; the notice and proceedings were quashed, against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 18:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 353 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373188</link>
      <description>A reassessment notice under section 148 issued in the name of a deceased assessee was held to be a jurisdictional nullity. Since the legal representative promptly objected to validity and did not comply with or submit to the AO&#039;s jurisdiction, there was no waiver of the statutory requirement of a valid section 148 notice. Section 292B could not cure issuance of a jurisdictional notice to a dead person in these circumstances. Consequently, in the absence of a valid notice, the AO lacked authority to assume jurisdiction under section 147, and all consequential reassessment proceedings were without authority of law and unsustainable; the notice and proceedings were quashed, against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>