<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 351 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373186</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the notice issued under Section 274 read with Section 271 of the Income Tax Act was invalid as it did not specify the nature of the default. Consequently, the penalty proceedings were deemed invalid, and the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2012-13 was deleted. The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced on January 4, 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2019 15:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 351 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373186</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the notice issued under Section 274 read with Section 271 of the Income Tax Act was invalid as it did not specify the nature of the default. Consequently, the penalty proceedings were deemed invalid, and the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 2012-13 was deleted. The appeal was allowed, and the order was pronounced on January 4, 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>