<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 350 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373185</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, guided by the decisions of the Hon&#039;ble Karnataka High Court, emphasized the necessity for clarity in the notice to ensure the assessee&#039;s right to contest the proceedings and meet the case of the Department effectively. The penalty levied for the assessment year 2007-08 was deleted due to the invalidity of the notice issued by the AO, as it failed to specify the nature of default, thereby violating the principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 10:49:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 350 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373185</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, guided by the decisions of the Hon&#039;ble Karnataka High Court, emphasized the necessity for clarity in the notice to ensure the assessee&#039;s right to contest the proceedings and meet the case of the Department effectively. The penalty levied for the assessment year 2007-08 was deleted due to the invalidity of the notice issued by the AO, as it failed to specify the nature of default, thereby violating the principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>