<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 341 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373176</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the revisionary orders of the Pr. CIT and allowed the appeals of the assessee. The Tribunal held that the AO had conducted a proper verification process and taken a possible view under the law. The Tribunal also noted that the Pr. CIT did not have jurisdiction to exercise powers u/s 263 when the matter was pending before the CIT(A). The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on a thorough examination of the facts, evidences, and relevant legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 07:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 341 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373176</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the revisionary orders of the Pr. CIT and allowed the appeals of the assessee. The Tribunal held that the AO had conducted a proper verification process and taken a possible view under the law. The Tribunal also noted that the Pr. CIT did not have jurisdiction to exercise powers u/s 263 when the matter was pending before the CIT(A). The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on a thorough examination of the facts, evidences, and relevant legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>