https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373172 The court dismissed the petitions challenging the validity of certain notifications issued under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. It held that the notifications were validly issued by the Central Government and authenticated by the Director General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) in accordance with rules. The court rejected arguments against the delegation of powers to the DGFT and found that the requirement to lay orders before Parliament was directory, not mandatory. The petitions were dismissed, and the notifications were upheld. en-us Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Jun 2019 11:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373172 The court dismissed the petitions challenging the validity of certain notifications issued under the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. It held that the notifications were validly issued by the Central Government and authenticated by the Director General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) in accordance with rules. The court rejected arguments against the delegation of powers to the DGFT and found that the requirement to lay orders before Parliament was directory, not mandatory. The petitions were dismissed, and the notifications were upheld. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 19 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373172