https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373169 Questions arose over whether confiscation, redemption fine and penalties under section 114(1) and section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 were properly sustained, and whether reliance on Notification No. 67 dated 23.1.2003 issued under rule 11 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963 was justified when that notification had not been specifically put in issue. The appeal was admitted on the substantial questions of law framed by the Court. en-us Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jan 2019 07:58:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373169 Questions arose over whether confiscation, redemption fine and penalties under section 114(1) and section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 were properly sustained, and whether reliance on Notification No. 67 dated 23.1.2003 issued under rule 11 of the Export (Quality Control and Inspection) Act, 1963 was justified when that notification had not been specifically put in issue. The appeal was admitted on the substantial questions of law framed by the Court. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373169