<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 323 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373158</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demands and penalties related to both the alleged manpower supply services and the ineligible input services. The deficiencies in the Show Cause Notice, the interpretational nature of the issue, and the broad definition of input services during the relevant period were critical factors in the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2019 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551624" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 323 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373158</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demands and penalties related to both the alleged manpower supply services and the ineligible input services. The deficiencies in the Show Cause Notice, the interpretational nature of the issue, and the broad definition of input services during the relevant period were critical factors in the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>