https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373146 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the demand and penalties imposed on the appellant. The Tribunal upheld the dropping of a major part of the demand related to excess electricity consumption. It found that reliance on third-party evidence alone was insufficient to prove clandestine removal of MS Ingots, emphasizing the need for clinching evidence. The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant, noting the lack of corroborative evidence supporting the allegations. en-us Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jan 2019 07:56:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373146 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the demand and penalties imposed on the appellant. The Tribunal upheld the dropping of a major part of the demand related to excess electricity consumption. It found that reliance on third-party evidence alone was insufficient to prove clandestine removal of MS Ingots, emphasizing the need for clinching evidence. The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant, noting the lack of corroborative evidence supporting the allegations. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373146