https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278080 For Section 24(2) of the 2013 land acquisition law, compensation was treated as unpaid where no tender to the landowner and no deposit in court were shown for the relevant parcels, and the pre-2013 acquisition therefore attracted deemed lapse. Objections to locus standi were rejected because the petitioners were shown through revenue records and a registered sale deed, while the alleged vesting in the Gaon Sabha was not substantiated by the record. Persons with a legally cognizable interest in the acquired land were held entitled to seek a declaration of lapse, and the writ petitions were allowed. en-us Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jan 2019 06:53:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278080 For Section 24(2) of the 2013 land acquisition law, compensation was treated as unpaid where no tender to the landowner and no deposit in court were shown for the relevant parcels, and the pre-2013 acquisition therefore attracted deemed lapse. Objections to locus standi were rejected because the petitioners were shown through revenue records and a registered sale deed, while the alleged vesting in the Gaon Sabha was not substantiated by the record. Persons with a legally cognizable interest in the acquired land were held entitled to seek a declaration of lapse, and the writ petitions were allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278080