https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278084 In an appeal under section 260-A of the Income-tax Act, the HC held that no substantial question of law arose because the Tribunal's deletion of additions rested on detailed factual findings regarding the genuineness of purchases, credits and cash credit entries. After examining books, confirmations, bank records, bills and stock registers, the Tribunal had accepted the assessee's case as a matter of fact. The Court found no perversity in those findings and treated the departmental grievances as pure questions of fact, so the additions deleted by the Tribunal were not interfered with. en-us Fri, 14 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278084 In an appeal under section 260-A of the Income-tax Act, the HC held that no substantial question of law arose because the Tribunal's deletion of additions rested on detailed factual findings regarding the genuineness of purchases, credits and cash credit entries. After examining books, confirmations, bank records, bills and stock registers, the Tribunal had accepted the assessee's case as a matter of fact. The Court found no perversity in those findings and treated the departmental grievances as pure questions of fact, so the additions deleted by the Tribunal were not interfered with. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 14 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278084