<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (9) TMI 50 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16158</link>
    <description>The court held that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to revise the intimation/assessment order under section 154 of the Income-tax Act. The disputed rectification notices were deemed invalid, and the writ petitions were granted without costs. The court emphasized that adjustments requiring investigation or adjudication cannot be made under section 143(1)(a) after the issuance of a regular assessment order under section 143(3).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:06:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (9) TMI 50 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16158</link>
      <description>The court held that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction to revise the intimation/assessment order under section 154 of the Income-tax Act. The disputed rectification notices were deemed invalid, and the writ petitions were granted without costs. The court emphasized that adjustments requiring investigation or adjudication cannot be made under section 143(1)(a) after the issuance of a regular assessment order under section 143(3).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>