<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 71 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16154</link>
    <description>The court affirmed that the assessee commenced commercial production from December 1, 1983, engaged in manufacturing activities, and was entitled to investment allowance under section 32A of the Income-tax Act for the relevant assessment years. The Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the deduction of Central subsidy from the cost of assets for depreciation and investment allowance was also upheld. The tax case petitions were disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 13:56:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=55154" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 71 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16154</link>
      <description>The court affirmed that the assessee commenced commercial production from December 1, 1983, engaged in manufacturing activities, and was entitled to investment allowance under section 32A of the Income-tax Act for the relevant assessment years. The Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the deduction of Central subsidy from the cost of assets for depreciation and investment allowance was also upheld. The tax case petitions were disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=16154</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>