<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 298 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373133</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) erred in treating the Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) as unexplained cash credits. The additions were deemed to be based on suspicion without concrete evidence. The tribunal deleted the additions, upheld the genuineness of the LTCG, and confirmed the applicability of the Section 10(38) exemption. Additionally, disallowance of brokerage commissions was overturned as a consequential issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 17:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 298 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373133</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) erred in treating the Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) as unexplained cash credits. The additions were deemed to be based on suspicion without concrete evidence. The tribunal deleted the additions, upheld the genuineness of the LTCG, and confirmed the applicability of the Section 10(38) exemption. Additionally, disallowance of brokerage commissions was overturned as a consequential issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>