<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 283 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373118</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the penalty under section 271D was unsustainable as transactions between close relatives for family purposes do not fall under section 269SS. The imposed penalty of Rs. 3,20,000 was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2019 10:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 283 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373118</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that the penalty under section 271D was unsustainable as transactions between close relatives for family purposes do not fall under section 269SS. The imposed penalty of Rs. 3,20,000 was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>