<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 278 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373113</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the AO to verify the additional investment of Rs. 8,34,000 made before property registration and grant full exemption under Section 54F, considering unavoidable delays. The decision emphasized the importance of payment date over registration for claiming exemption, aligning with judicial precedents and recognizing the assessee&#039;s genuine intention to invest in a new property.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 12:23:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551460" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 278 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373113</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the AO to verify the additional investment of Rs. 8,34,000 made before property registration and grant full exemption under Section 54F, considering unavoidable delays. The decision emphasized the importance of payment date over registration for claiming exemption, aligning with judicial precedents and recognizing the assessee&#039;s genuine intention to invest in a new property.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>