https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373109 The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the Pr. CIT's order regarding the cash deposits but modified it to exclude the issue of the cost of acquisition, which was already under appeal before the CIT(A). The delay in filing the appeal was condoned, and the validity of the show-cause notice and the assumption of jurisdiction by the Pr. CIT were upheld. en-us Mon, 31 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Jan 2019 12:23:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373109 The appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld the Pr. CIT's order regarding the cash deposits but modified it to exclude the issue of the cost of acquisition, which was already under appeal before the CIT(A). The delay in filing the appeal was condoned, and the validity of the show-cause notice and the assumption of jurisdiction by the Pr. CIT were upheld. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 31 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373109