<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 265 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373100</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal concerning disallowances under sections 14A and 36(I)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. Regarding section 14A, the Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowance as no exempt income was earned. Concerning section 36(I)(iii), the Tribunal found in favor of the assessee based on precedents and lack of distinguishing facts for the current year. As no other issues were raised, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed on 17.12.2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 12:23:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 265 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373100</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal concerning disallowances under sections 14A and 36(I)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. Regarding section 14A, the Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowance as no exempt income was earned. Concerning section 36(I)(iii), the Tribunal found in favor of the assessee based on precedents and lack of distinguishing facts for the current year. As no other issues were raised, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed on 17.12.2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>