<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 252 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373087</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant for availing cenvat credit without maintaining separate accounts for exempted services. Despite the appellant reversing the credit and paying the demanded amount with interest before the Show Cause Notice, the Tribunal held that no penalty could be imposed under relevant provisions. Citing legal precedents and statutory provisions, the Tribunal ruled that payment of tax or wrongly availed credit with interest before issuance of the Show Cause Notice precludes the imposition of penalties. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, overturning the penalty decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 12:19:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 252 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373087</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant for availing cenvat credit without maintaining separate accounts for exempted services. Despite the appellant reversing the credit and paying the demanded amount with interest before the Show Cause Notice, the Tribunal held that no penalty could be imposed under relevant provisions. Citing legal precedents and statutory provisions, the Tribunal ruled that payment of tax or wrongly availed credit with interest before issuance of the Show Cause Notice precludes the imposition of penalties. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, overturning the penalty decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>