<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 248 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373083</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of duty and classification of the product under Tariff Heading 2106 9070 as &#039;churan for pan&#039;. The penalty imposed under Section 11AC/25 was set aside due to the absence of suppression or fraud allegations, as the issue pertained to goods classification interpretation. Consequently, the appeals were partly allowed based on these findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 16:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 248 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373083</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of duty and classification of the product under Tariff Heading 2106 9070 as &#039;churan for pan&#039;. The penalty imposed under Section 11AC/25 was set aside due to the absence of suppression or fraud allegations, as the issue pertained to goods classification interpretation. Consequently, the appeals were partly allowed based on these findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373083</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>