https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373069 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI adjourned four appeals sine die, involving the classification of goods and whether the appellant's activity amounted to manufacture. The Department alleged manufacturing and clandestine removal of excisable goods, while the appellants argued to the contrary, citing lack of evidence and pending appeals in the Apex Court. The Tribunal found the appeals maintainable due to additional data post-previous adjudication but adjourned them to await the Apex Court's decision to prevent conflicting judgments and unnecessary expenditure, granting parties liberty to seek remedies post the Apex Court's outcome. en-us Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Jan 2019 12:17:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373069 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI adjourned four appeals sine die, involving the classification of goods and whether the appellant's activity amounted to manufacture. The Department alleged manufacturing and clandestine removal of excisable goods, while the appellants argued to the contrary, citing lack of evidence and pending appeals in the Apex Court. The Tribunal found the appeals maintainable due to additional data post-previous adjudication but adjourned them to await the Apex Court's decision to prevent conflicting judgments and unnecessary expenditure, granting parties liberty to seek remedies post the Apex Court's outcome. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 15 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373069