<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 233 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373068</link>
    <description>Procedural fairness required deferring coercive recovery where an appeal and stay petition had been filed against the assessment order. Recovery action was not to be pursued until the appellate authority considered the stay petition, and the stay application was to be disposed of expeditiously.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 12:17:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 233 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373068</link>
      <description>Procedural fairness required deferring coercive recovery where an appeal and stay petition had been filed against the assessment order. Recovery action was not to be pursued until the appellate authority considered the stay petition, and the stay application was to be disposed of expeditiously.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>