<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (1) TMI 99 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278063</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the detention of Abdul Bari Kairanvi but quashed the second detention order of Masood Alam due to the absence of fresh facts. The judgments emphasize the importance of relevant and specific grounds for detention, the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority, and the necessity of fresh facts for new detention orders after the expiry or revocation of previous orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2019 11:52:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551392" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (1) TMI 99 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278063</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the detention of Abdul Bari Kairanvi but quashed the second detention order of Masood Alam due to the absence of fresh facts. The judgments emphasize the importance of relevant and specific grounds for detention, the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority, and the necessity of fresh facts for new detention orders after the expiry or revocation of previous orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>