https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278063 Preventive detention based on subjective satisfaction is distinct from criminal prosecution, and the existence of material attracting other penal or security proceedings does not by itself establish mala fides or invalidate detention. A fresh detention order cannot rest on the same antecedent facts after an earlier order has expired unless supported by fresh material, but detention is sustainable where the grounds are relevant, definite, and sufficient to justify satisfaction that the person is likely to act prejudicially to public order or the security of the State. Grounds involving communal hatred, calls for violence, and anti-national tendencies were treated as capable of supporting detention, and alleged vagueness did not prevent an effective representation. en-us Thu, 11 Jan 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Jan 2019 11:52:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278063 Preventive detention based on subjective satisfaction is distinct from criminal prosecution, and the existence of material attracting other penal or security proceedings does not by itself establish mala fides or invalidate detention. A fresh detention order cannot rest on the same antecedent facts after an earlier order has expired unless supported by fresh material, but detention is sustainable where the grounds are relevant, definite, and sufficient to justify satisfaction that the person is likely to act prejudicially to public order or the security of the State. Grounds involving communal hatred, calls for violence, and anti-national tendencies were treated as capable of supporting detention, and alleged vagueness did not prevent an effective representation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Jan 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278063