https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278060 The petition was dismissed as the court found Rule 32 and Regulation 14 valid. The petitioner's concerns about seniority and promotion were acknowledged but did not impact the transfer's legality. The court advised pursuing salary claims through a civil suit. No costs were awarded, and the security deposit was to be refunded to the petitioner. en-us Tue, 04 Dec 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 07 Jan 2019 11:29:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278060 The petition was dismissed as the court found Rule 32 and Regulation 14 valid. The petitioner's concerns about seniority and promotion were acknowledged but did not impact the transfer's legality. The court advised pursuing salary claims through a civil suit. No costs were awarded, and the security deposit was to be refunded to the petitioner. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Dec 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278060