https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278059 The Privy Council held that the Faridkote Court lacked jurisdiction over the foreign defendant who had left the native State, emphasizing the importance of territorial jurisdiction under international law. The Court recognized the foreign judgments but ruled them null due to the defendant's absence from the jurisdiction where the contract was formed. The decision highlighted the need for defendants to submit to a court's jurisdiction for fairness and adherence to legal standards, ultimately overturning conflicting decisions and ordering the Respondent to cover the appeal costs. en-us Sat, 28 Jul 1894 00:00:00 +0521 Mon, 07 Jan 2019 11:26:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278059 The Privy Council held that the Faridkote Court lacked jurisdiction over the foreign defendant who had left the native State, emphasizing the importance of territorial jurisdiction under international law. The Court recognized the foreign judgments but ruled them null due to the defendant's absence from the jurisdiction where the contract was formed. The decision highlighted the need for defendants to submit to a court's jurisdiction for fairness and adherence to legal standards, ultimately overturning conflicting decisions and ordering the Respondent to cover the appeal costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 28 Jul 1894 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278059