<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (7) TMI 713 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278035</link>
    <description>Amended service regulations prescribing revised qualifications for Junior Assistant and Assistant Lineman posts were upheld because an employer may determine recruitment standards suited to the post, and the changes were not shown to be arbitrary or unconstitutional. The withdrawal of free electricity for future incumbents was also upheld because service benefits created by an award may be altered by a valid subsequent settlement, award, or statutory regulation made under delegated legislative power, and distinguishing existing employees from future recruits was held to be a lawful classification. The writ challenge to both regulatory changes therefore failed, and the regulations were treated as legally valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2019 15:51:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551262" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (7) TMI 713 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278035</link>
      <description>Amended service regulations prescribing revised qualifications for Junior Assistant and Assistant Lineman posts were upheld because an employer may determine recruitment standards suited to the post, and the changes were not shown to be arbitrary or unconstitutional. The withdrawal of free electricity for future incumbents was also upheld because service benefits created by an award may be altered by a valid subsequent settlement, award, or statutory regulation made under delegated legislative power, and distinguishing existing employees from future recruits was held to be a lawful classification. The writ challenge to both regulatory changes therefore failed, and the regulations were treated as legally valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>