<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1306 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278031</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal found discrepancies in the payment dates provided by the assessee and sent the matter back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The orders disallowing PF and ESIC payments were set aside, directing the Assessing Officer to decide afresh after allowing the assessee a reasonable opportunity to be heard. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the order pronounced in open court on 23.12.2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2019 11:31:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1306 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278031</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal found discrepancies in the payment dates provided by the assessee and sent the matter back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The orders disallowing PF and ESIC payments were set aside, directing the Assessing Officer to decide afresh after allowing the assessee a reasonable opportunity to be heard. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the order pronounced in open court on 23.12.2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>