<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 216 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373051</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, permitting the deduction for excise duty on warranty goods and sending the issue of prior period expenditure back for reassessment. However, the disallowances of Share Issue Expenditure and expenditure on gifts were upheld due to insufficient evidence and lack of business justification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2019 13:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=551108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 216 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373051</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, permitting the deduction for excise duty on warranty goods and sending the issue of prior period expenditure back for reassessment. However, the disallowances of Share Issue Expenditure and expenditure on gifts were upheld due to insufficient evidence and lack of business justification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=373051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>